<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the new Google favicon sucks*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/</link>
	<description>Demystifying Usability</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Bowers</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-810</guid>
		<description>The previous favicon did need some work, but different applications have different needs. The Google brand should be recognizable as a logo, as a desktop icon, as a phone icon, and as a 16x16 browser favicon. Each of those formats has different needs. Obviously a 16x16 favicon has the greatest design burden because it's so small and because it needs to stand out in long lists of other small favicons.

What's crazy is that dealing with icons at different sizes is a known and solvable problem. You make a nice detailed big alpha channeled icon  for the desktop and a tight distinctive one at 16x16. Google shoulda hired this guy: http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/ Everyone uses his free icons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The previous favicon did need some work, but different applications have different needs. The Google brand should be recognizable as a logo, as a desktop icon, as a phone icon, and as a 16&#215;16 browser favicon. Each of those formats has different needs. Obviously a 16&#215;16 favicon has the greatest design burden because it&#8217;s so small and because it needs to stand out in long lists of other small favicons.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s crazy is that dealing with icons at different sizes is a known and solvable problem. You make a nice detailed big alpha channeled icon  for the desktop and a tight distinctive one at 16&#215;16. Google shoulda hired this guy: <a href="http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/">http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/</a> Everyone uses his free icons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alister Cameron // Blogologist</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Alister Cameron // Blogologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Agree, it sucks. Can't make any sense of it. What is Google thinking??

Frankly, it's a point of weakness in the brand of the world's largest "Internet company" that they don't have way of representing themselves in a favicon that works well!

Could it be that if you plan on ubiquity on the web, a key design issue is the attractiveness of your favicon?!?!

Ponder ponder.

-Alister</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, it sucks. Can&#8217;t make any sense of it. What is Google thinking??</p>
<p>Frankly, it&#8217;s a point of weakness in the brand of the world&#8217;s largest &#8220;Internet company&#8221; that they don&#8217;t have way of representing themselves in a favicon that works well!</p>
<p>Could it be that if you plan on ubiquity on the web, a key design issue is the attractiveness of your favicon?!?!</p>
<p>Ponder ponder.</p>
<p>-Alister</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gb</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>gb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-739</guid>
		<description>i don't get it. how is a large G not able to work across multiple applications? that small squigly emasculated "g" seems to be the work of the marketing department trying to prove it's worth to the company. bet you they spent tons of departmental ass kissing on this, and the so called "creative guys" are starting to take over... oh oh....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t get it. how is a large G not able to work across multiple applications? that small squigly emasculated &#8220;g&#8221; seems to be the work of the marketing department trying to prove it&#8217;s worth to the company. bet you they spent tons of departmental ass kissing on this, and the so called &#8220;creative guys&#8221; are starting to take over&#8230; oh oh&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britta</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Britta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 02:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-736</guid>
		<description>http://www.bringbacktheoldgooglefavicon.com/index.php

created by a friend of a friend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bringbacktheoldgooglefavicon.com/index.php">http://www.bringbacktheoldgooglefavicon.com/index.php</a></p>
<p>created by a friend of a friend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Bowers</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-732</guid>
		<description>Looks like the non-engineer "Prince of Insufficient Light" types are infiltrating Google. Not a good sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the non-engineer &#8220;Prince of Insufficient Light&#8221; types are infiltrating Google. Not a good sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pachi</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>pachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Search Engine Land has an official position from Google:
“We recognized there was a need for a Google icon that would better work across multiple applications including web, mobile and client applications. We felt the small ‘g’ had many of the characteristics that best represent our brand: it’s simple, playful, and unique. We will be looking to improve and enhance this icon as we move forward.“

more on http://arbitness.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/why-google-changed-their-favicon/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search Engine Land has an official position from Google:<br />
“We recognized there was a need for a Google icon that would better work across multiple applications including web, mobile and client applications. We felt the small ‘g’ had many of the characteristics that best represent our brand: it’s simple, playful, and unique. We will be looking to improve and enhance this icon as we move forward.“</p>
<p>more on <a href="http://arbitness.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/why-google-changed-their-favicon/">http://arbitness.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/why-google-changed-their-favicon/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Bowers</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-702</guid>
		<description>I think there's already a Greasemonkey script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s already a Greasemonkey script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Icon SUCKS</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>New Icon SUCKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-701</guid>
		<description>NEW ICON REALLY SUCKS!!! I want the old one back!!! Is there anyway I can assign the old one? Addons or shit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW ICON REALLY SUCKS!!! I want the old one back!!! Is there anyway I can assign the old one? Addons or shit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.262 seconds -->
