<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Avelox 400 Mg Tablet - HQ Pharmacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/</link>
	<description>&#160;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Avelox 400 Mg Tablet - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-810</guid>
		<description>The previous favicon did need some work, but different applications have different needs. The Google brand should be recognizable as a logo, as a desktop icon, as a phone icon, and as a 16x16 browser favicon. Each of those formats has different needs. Obviously a 16x16 favicon has the greatest design burden because it&#039;s so small and because it needs to stand out in long lists of other small favicons.

What&#039;s crazy is that dealing with icons at different sizes is a known and solvable problem. You make a nice detailed big alpha channeled icon  for the desktop and a tight distinctive one at 16x16. Google shoulda hired this guy: http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/ Everyone uses his free icons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The previous favicon did need some work, but different applications have different needs. The Google brand should be recognizable as a logo, as a desktop icon, as a phone icon, and as a 16&#215;16 browser favicon. Each of those formats has different needs. Obviously a 16&#215;16 favicon has the greatest design burden because it&#8217;s so small and because it needs to stand out in long lists of other small favicons.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s crazy is that dealing with icons at different sizes is a known and solvable problem. You make a nice detailed big alpha channeled icon  for the desktop and a tight distinctive one at 16&#215;16. Google shoulda hired this guy: <a href="http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/" rel="nofollow">http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/</a> Everyone uses his free icons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avelox 400 Mg Tablet - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Alister Cameron // Blogologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Agree, it sucks. Can&#039;t make any sense of it. What is Google thinking??

Frankly, it&#039;s a point of weakness in the brand of the world&#039;s largest &quot;Internet company&quot; that they don&#039;t have way of representing themselves in a favicon that works well!

Could it be that if you plan on ubiquity on the web, a key design issue is the attractiveness of your favicon?!?!

Ponder ponder.

-Alister</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, it sucks. Can&#8217;t make any sense of it. What is Google thinking??</p>
<p>Frankly, it&#8217;s a point of weakness in the brand of the world&#8217;s largest &#8220;Internet company&#8221; that they don&#8217;t have way of representing themselves in a favicon that works well!</p>
<p>Could it be that if you plan on ubiquity on the web, a key design issue is the attractiveness of your favicon?!?!</p>
<p>Ponder ponder.</p>
<p>-Alister</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avelox 400 Mg Tablet - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>gb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-739</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t get it. how is a large G not able to work across multiple applications? that small squigly emasculated &quot;g&quot; seems to be the work of the marketing department trying to prove it&#039;s worth to the company. bet you they spent tons of departmental ass kissing on this, and the so called &quot;creative guys&quot; are starting to take over... oh oh....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t get it. how is a large G not able to work across multiple applications? that small squigly emasculated &#8220;g&#8221; seems to be the work of the marketing department trying to prove it&#8217;s worth to the company. bet you they spent tons of departmental ass kissing on this, and the so called &#8220;creative guys&#8221; are starting to take over&#8230; oh oh&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avelox 400 Mg Tablet - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Britta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 02:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-736</guid>
		<description>http://www.bringbacktheoldgooglefavicon.com/index.php

created by a friend of a friend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bringbacktheoldgooglefavicon.com/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bringbacktheoldgooglefavicon.com/index.php</a></p>
<p>created by a friend of a friend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avelox 400 Mg Tablet - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-732</guid>
		<description>Looks like the non-engineer &quot;Prince of Insufficient Light&quot; types are infiltrating Google. Not a good sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the non-engineer &#8220;Prince of Insufficient Light&#8221; types are infiltrating Google. Not a good sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avelox 400 Mg Tablet - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>pachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Search Engine Land has an official position from Google:
“We recognized there was a need for a Google icon that would better work across multiple applications including web, mobile and client applications. We felt the small ‘g’ had many of the characteristics that best represent our brand: it’s simple, playful, and unique. We will be looking to improve and enhance this icon as we move forward.“

more on http://arbitness.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/why-google-changed-their-favicon/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search Engine Land has an official position from Google:<br />
“We recognized there was a need for a Google icon that would better work across multiple applications including web, mobile and client applications. We felt the small ‘g’ had many of the characteristics that best represent our brand: it’s simple, playful, and unique. We will be looking to improve and enhance this icon as we move forward.“</p>
<p>more on <a href="http://arbitness.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/why-google-changed-their-favicon/" rel="nofollow">http://arbitness.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/why-google-changed-their-favicon/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avelox 400 Mg Tablet - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-702</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s already a Greasemonkey script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s already a Greasemonkey script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avelox 400 Mg Tablet - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/design/why-the-new-google-favicon-sucks/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>New Icon SUCKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/?p=448#comment-701</guid>
		<description>NEW ICON REALLY SUCKS!!! I want the old one back!!! Is there anyway I can assign the old one? Addons or shit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW ICON REALLY SUCKS!!! I want the old one back!!! Is there anyway I can assign the old one? Addons or shit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
