<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I love economics, and so can you!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathanbowers.com/economics/i-love-economics-and-so-can-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathanbowers.com/economics/i-love-economics-and-so-can-you/</link>
	<description>Demystifying Usability</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Bowers</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/economics/i-love-economics-and-so-can-you/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/2008/01/16/i-love-economics-and-so-can-you/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Hi Tejvan,

Thomas Malthus wrote in &lt;strong&gt;1798&lt;/strong&gt; that population growth would outstrip resources and plunge the world back into the stone age. Latter day Malthusian Paul Ehrlich predicted in his 1968 book The Population Bomb that overpopulation would cause huge famines by the 1980's.

...Still waiting for that famine, it might help out with the growing problem with obesity. So, yeah, I'm not too worried about the world ever having too many people and not enough resources. 

One reason I'm not worried is that we have more people than ever but the world is more wealthy (in real quality of life terms) than ever (why this is would be a topic for a whole post). I would rather be a poor American today with plenty of internet and penicillin than a king from 200 years ago. Another reason is that people have been predicting overpopulation doom and gloom forever and it hasn't happened yet. In fact, the more developed a nation is the closer it comes to "replacement" reproduction rates, and in fact many developed nations are below "replacement" now.

See also: The famous wager between &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon-Ehrlich_wager" rel="nofollow"&gt;Julian Simon and Paul Ehrlich&lt;/a&gt; on population growth and resource prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tejvan,</p>
<p>Thomas Malthus wrote in <strong>1798</strong> that population growth would outstrip resources and plunge the world back into the stone age. Latter day Malthusian Paul Ehrlich predicted in his 1968 book The Population Bomb that overpopulation would cause huge famines by the 1980&#8217;s.</p>
<p>&#8230;Still waiting for that famine, it might help out with the growing problem with obesity. So, yeah, I&#8217;m not too worried about the world ever having too many people and not enough resources. </p>
<p>One reason I&#8217;m not worried is that we have more people than ever but the world is more wealthy (in real quality of life terms) than ever (why this is would be a topic for a whole post). I would rather be a poor American today with plenty of internet and penicillin than a king from 200 years ago. Another reason is that people have been predicting overpopulation doom and gloom forever and it hasn&#8217;t happened yet. In fact, the more developed a nation is the closer it comes to &#8220;replacement&#8221; reproduction rates, and in fact many developed nations are below &#8220;replacement&#8221; now.</p>
<p>See also: The famous wager between <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon-Ehrlich_wager">Julian Simon and Paul Ehrlich</a> on population growth and resource prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tejvan Pettinger</title>
		<link>http://nathanbowers.com/economics/i-love-economics-and-so-can-you/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Tejvan Pettinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathanbowers.com/2008/01/16/i-love-economics-and-so-can-you/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>As an economics teacher, it's kind of nice to come across that kind of headline for a blog post! I agree economics doesn't have to be a dismal science. In fact, a flurry of populist books (i.e. Freakonomics) have shown how economics can apply to everything from prostitution to price of petrol

Here's a question: Do you ever think the dire predictions of T.Malthus (i.e. overpopulation and loss of resources) will come true?
 
Best,

Tejvan
www.economicshelp.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an economics teacher, it&#8217;s kind of nice to come across that kind of headline for a blog post! I agree economics doesn&#8217;t have to be a dismal science. In fact, a flurry of populist books (i.e. Freakonomics) have shown how economics can apply to everything from prostitution to price of petrol</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a question: Do you ever think the dire predictions of T.Malthus (i.e. overpopulation and loss of resources) will come true?</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Tejvan<br />
<a href="http://www.economicshelp.org">http://www.economicshelp.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.294 seconds -->
